Avow to this perspective entirely. I agree that part of beauty is its mystery. In a sense, that mystery attracts our interest even due to uncertainty, skepticism and its silent invitation to human curiosity i.e. how can X be so categorically beautiful in the specific category of Y and context of Z? We inherently reason our way to beauty and mystery, and then sometimes try to reason back out of it.

I would even go as far to say that the opportunity to practice reasoning is itself a waypoint to edifying an existing experience.

Yet, then we barrel back to Duchamp’s dilemma: rationales and reasoning are frameworks — while objective in themselves — are subjectively chosen.